<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Republican Party</title>
	<link>http://www.courageofconviction.org/blog/2006/10/18/new-republican-party/</link>
	<description>Unleashing Courage</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Matthew Best</title>
		<link>http://www.courageofconviction.org/blog/2006/10/18/new-republican-party/#comment-2438</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.courageofconviction.org/blog/2006/10/18/new-republican-party/#comment-2438</guid>
					<description>Antibush, It is obvious that we are not even close to understanding one another for me to even begin to comment on your comment.  You are making comments at the end result and I don't have a clue how you got there.  That makes communication a bit difficult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Antibush, It is obvious that we are not even close to understanding one another for me to even begin to comment on your comment.  You are making comments at the end result and I don&#8217;t have a clue how you got there.  That makes communication a bit difficult.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Antibush</title>
		<link>http://www.courageofconviction.org/blog/2006/10/18/new-republican-party/#comment-2404</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 04:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.courageofconviction.org/blog/2006/10/18/new-republican-party/#comment-2404</guid>
					<description>Bush and the Republicans were not protecting us on 9-11, and we aren't a lot safer now.  We may be more afraid due to george bush, but are we safer?  Being fearful does not necessarily make one safer.  Fear can cause people to hide and cower.  What do you think? How does that work in a democracy again?  How does being more threatening make us more likeable?Isn't the country with 
the most weapons the biggest threat to the rest of the world?  When one country is the biggest threat to the rest of the world, isn't that likely to be the most hated country? 
 Our country is in debt until forever, we don't have jobs, and we live in fear.  We have invaded a country and been responsible for thousands of deaths. 
The more people that the government puts in jails, the safer we are told to think we are.  The real  terrorists are wherever they are, but they aren't living in a country with bars on the windows.  We are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush and the Republicans were not protecting us on 9-11, and we aren&#8217;t a lot safer now.  We may be more afraid due to george bush, but are we safer?  Being fearful does not necessarily make one safer.  Fear can cause people to hide and cower.  What do you think? How does that work in a democracy again?  How does being more threatening make us more likeable?Isn&#8217;t the country with<br />
the most weapons the biggest threat to the rest of the world?  When one country is the biggest threat to the rest of the world, isn&#8217;t that likely to be the most hated country?<br />
 Our country is in debt until forever, we don&#8217;t have jobs, and we live in fear.  We have invaded a country and been responsible for thousands of deaths.<br />
The more people that the government puts in jails, the safer we are told to think we are.  The real  terrorists are wherever they are, but they aren&#8217;t living in a country with bars on the windows.  We are.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
